advertisement
Section Sponsor
livinggreensa.com

A Greener City: S.A. just keeps on sprawling

By Jennifer Hiller - Express-News
Web Posted: 08/10/2008 12:00 CDT
 
In 1997, a new city master plan painted an idealistic image of San Antonio's future.

We would become a city of responsible urban design and protected natural and culture resources, with the foresight to build infrastructure ahead of new development.

Our community would become pedestrian friendly and decreasingly car dependent.

It all sounded very nice on paper.

Then San Antonio's economy took flight. New residents — many of them from California and South and West Texas — poured into San Antonio and its suburbs.

The region went on a record-breaking home-building spree, adding more than 123,000 single-family houses in the years following the adoption of the master plan, according to data from the housing research firm Metrostudy.

That's a quarter of all single-family homes in the entire metropolitan area, which includes Bexar and its surrounding counties.

Job growth and an affordable housing market — kept affordable, in part, by few limits on development — have combined to power San Antonio's growth, and continue to help buoy the city through these rocky economic times.

But at the same time, nearly all of those 123,000 homes sprouted in traditional suburban neighborhoods on the edge of Bexar County and beyond, where people typically commute long distances to work and drive for every errand.

A report from the Texas Transportation Institute last year estimated that residents spend 39 hours a year stuck in rush hour, twice as much time as they did in 1995. More tree canopy has been lost, and as early as 2002 the Bexar Appraisal District estimated that more than half of the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone on the North Side already had been developed.

12 comment(s) on "A Greener City: S.A. just keeps on sprawling"
You have 2000 characters remaining for your comment.
Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post here. Comments are subject to the site's terms and conditions of use and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or approval of mySA.com. Readers whose comments violate the terms of use may have their comments removed or all of their content blocked from viewing by other users without notification.
ckaupert11:36 AM
Simple answer: concurrency. If developers were made to help pay (in other words, INVEST) for the impact created by communities they created outside the loop, it WOULD slow things down. The developers don't give a damn whether there is existing infrastructure to support their communities---- Secondly, the 'appreciation' of homes outside the loop, particularly in the stone oak area was obscene for about 5 years----over DOUBLE other areas---now, because of all the 'investors' who came in, looking to make a quick buck, we have foreclosures surrounding us too. To say 'managing growth' is contrary to the ideas of the free market is just silly---it is quite simply SMART. It makes for a better quality of life and the maximum utility of resources---including roads, water, land and taxes, but that is just my humble opinion.
khi2:45 PM
aiizaku_2003, I agree with you also - but would not put Austin in the same category as NYC. Austin is highly overrated.
View all comments
 
 
 

>> Cycling calendar
>> See complete calendar
>> Submit your event
 
 
ALSO FOLLOW US ON ...
 
LivingGreenSA.com MySpace
 
Send your questions, comments and ideas for LivingGreenSA.com to brown@mysanantonio.com.